Brenix inspection report
142 Cedar Ridge Lane
142 Cedar Ridge Lane, Maplewood Heights, MI 48213
- Inspection date
- March 14, 2026
- Inspector
- M. Alvarez, HI-48213
- Pack
- Residential Property v1.0.0
- Findings
- 18 of 18 reviewed
2
Severe
9
Moderate
7
Minor
About this report
How this report was produced
Step 1
Evidence captured in the field
Photographs, measurements, and field notes were captured on site and time-stamped at the point of capture. Each item carries a content hash recorded at upload.
Step 2
Findings drafted against a pinned protocol pack
Each observation was matched to an item in the Residential Property v1.0.0 pack. The pack version is fixed for the life of this report.
Step 3
Every finding traced to its source
No finding appears without a linked evidence item and a curated source reference. Ungrounded statements were withheld rather than inferred.
Step 4
Inspector review and approval
The inspector of record reviewed, edited where necessary, and explicitly approved every drafted finding before release.
Executive summary
18 findings across six systems
Two conditions are rated Severe and require correction before occupancy. Nine are rated Moderate and should be corrected within a defined period. Seven are rated Minor and represent routine maintenance or baseline observations. F-15 records combustion spillage from a separated furnace flue joint; the furnace should not be operated until corrected. F-08 records double-tapped breakers in the main service panel, a recognised fire-risk configuration.
| System | Severe | Moderate | Minor | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roof & Exterior | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Structural | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Electrical | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Plumbing | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| HVAC | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Insulation & Ventilation | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| All systems | 2 | 9 | 7 | 18 |
Priority actions
| ID | Finding | Referral | Timing |
|---|---|---|---|
| F-15 | Separated furnace flue vent connector | HVAC contractor | Immediate |
| F-08 | Double-tapped breakers in service panel | Licensed electrician | Before occupancy |
| F-09 | Absent GFCI protection at wet locations | Licensed electrician | 30 days |
| F-18 | Bath exhaust terminating in attic | HVAC or general contractor | 60 days |
| F-06 | Floor joist notched beyond allowable depth | Contractor or engineer | 90 days |
| F-13 | S-trap at kitchen sink drain | Plumber | 90 days |
| F-16 | Disconnected supply duct in crawlspace | HVAC contractor | 90 days |
| F-03 | Deteriorated chimney base flashing | Roofing contractor | Before winter |
| F-01 | Roof covering near end of life | Roofing contractor | 3 to 5 years |
Scope and limitations
What was and wasn't inspected
| Roof covering, flashings and penetrations | Inspected | From ground and roof edge |
| Gutters, downspouts and surface drainage | Inspected | Full perimeter |
| Exterior cladding, trim and openings | Inspected | All elevations |
| Foundation, basement and crawlspace | Inspected | Full access obtained |
| Floor, wall and roof framing | Inspected | Where visible |
| Electrical service, panel and distribution | Inspected | Panel cover removed |
| Receptacles, switches and fixtures | Inspected | Representative sample |
| Water supply, distribution and fixtures | Inspected | All accessible |
| Drain, waste and vent piping | Inspected | Where visible |
| Water heating equipment | Inspected | Operated |
| Heating equipment and distribution | Inspected | Operated |
| Cooling equipment | Not inspected | Outside operating temperature range |
| Insulation and ventilation | Inspected | Attic and crawlspace |
| Interior surfaces, doors and windows | Inspected | Representative sample |
| Attached garage and vehicle door | Inspected | Auto-reverse tested |
| Fireplace and solid fuel appliances | Not inspected | None present |
| Private water or septic systems | Not inspected | Municipal service |
| Swimming pool or spa | Not inspected | None present |
| Detached structures | Not inspected | None present |
| Environmental hazards, pests, mould testing | Excluded | Outside scope of engagement |
- Weather
- Overcast, dry; 46°F
- Occupancy
- Vacant, furnished
- Ground condition
- Dry
- Utilities on
- Water, gas, electric
Inspection findings
Every finding, grouped by system
Roof & Exterior
F-01 · South-facing roof plane
Roof covering approaching end of serviceable life
ModerateObservation
Curling and granule loss were observed across a majority of asphalt shingles on the south-facing roof plane. Granule accumulation was present in the gutter trough below. Shingle edges lifted under light hand pressure at three sampled locations. No active leak, interior staining, or daylight penetration was observed at the time of inspection.
Why it matters
Granule loss exposes the asphalt mat to ultraviolet degradation, which accelerates further deterioration. The south-facing plane receives the greatest solar load and typically fails first. Remaining service life is estimated at three to five years under normal weather conditions.
Recommendation
Budget for full roof covering replacement within three to five years. Monitor the attic for staining after heavy rainfall in the interim. Obtain a roofing contractor evaluation before the next winter season.
Referral: Roofing contractor
P-01P-02P-03Curated source: RC-4.12 · Protocol item: roof_covering_inspectionF-02 · Northeast corner, exterior
Downspout discharges at grade adjacent to foundation
MinorObservation
The downspout at the northeast corner terminates directly at grade with no extension or splash block. Soil erosion was visible in a shallow channel running toward the foundation wall. An adjacent crawlspace vent sits approximately 18 inches from the discharge point.
Why it matters
Concentrated roof runoff discharging at the foundation is a common contributor to hydrostatic pressure, foundation movement, and crawlspace moisture. The proximity of the crawlspace vent creates a direct path for water entry during heavy rainfall.
Recommendation
Install a splash block or downspout extension routing discharge a minimum of six feet from the foundation. Regrade the eroded channel to maintain positive drainage away from the structure.
Referral: Owner maintenance
P-04Curated source: GT-2.03 · Protocol item: gutter_drainage_inspectionF-03 · Chimney base, north roof plane
Deteriorated sealant at chimney base flashing
ModerateObservation
The counter-flashing at the chimney base shows separated and cracked sealant along the north and east faces. A gap of approximately 4 mm was measured at the northeast corner. Minor rust staining was present on the step flashing below.
Why it matters
Chimney flashing is among the most frequent points of roof water entry. Separated sealant permits water to track behind the counter-flashing and into the roof structure, where damage can progress without visible interior evidence for extended periods.
Recommendation
Have the counter-flashing resealed by a qualified roofing contractor. Inspect the attic sheathing adjacent to the chimney chase for staining during the same visit.
Referral: Roofing contractor
P-05P-06Curated source: FL-4.21 · Protocol item: chimney_flashing_inspectionF-04 · South elevation, near grade
Impact damage to vinyl cladding
MinorObservation
Two vinyl siding panels on the south elevation show cracking consistent with impact damage, located approximately 30 inches above grade near the driveway. The weather-resistive barrier behind the damaged panels appeared intact where visible through the cracks.
Why it matters
Cracked cladding permits wind-driven rain to reach the weather-resistive barrier and sheathing. The condition is cosmetic in the near term but will admit moisture over time.
Recommendation
Replace the two damaged panels. Vinyl siding panels can be individually removed and replaced without disturbing surrounding courses.
Referral: Owner maintenance
P-07Curated source: EX-7.09 · Protocol item: cladding_inspection
Structural
F-05 · Northwest corner, basement
Vertical hairline crack in poured foundation wall
ModerateObservation
A vertical crack measuring approximately 1.6 mm at its widest point was observed in the poured concrete foundation wall at the northwest corner of the basement, extending from approximately 14 inches below the sill plate to within 8 inches of the slab. No lateral displacement was measured across the crack. No efflorescence, staining, or active water intrusion was visible at the time of inspection.
Why it matters
Vertical cracks of this width in poured foundations are commonly associated with concrete shrinkage during curing and are not typically structural. However, width change over time is the indicator that distinguishes shrinkage cracking from active movement, and that determination requires monitoring rather than a single observation.
Recommendation
Record the crack width at the widest point and re-measure seasonally. Seal with a flexible polyurethane or epoxy injection as a moisture-prevention measure. Engage a licensed structural engineer if width increases beyond 3 mm or if lateral displacement develops.
Referral: Monitor; structural engineer if progressive
P-08P-09Curated source: FD-1.08 · Protocol item: foundation_wall_inspectionF-06 · Crawlspace, central bay
Floor joist notched beyond allowable depth
ModerateObservation
A 2x10 floor joist in the central crawlspace bay has been notched on its lower edge to approximately 4 inches depth to accommodate a drain line. The notch is located near mid-span. No sag, splitting, or deflection was measured at the time of inspection.
Why it matters
Notching the tension edge of a joist near mid-span removes a disproportionate share of its bending capacity. Conventional framing practice limits notch depth and prohibits notching in the middle third of the span entirely. The condition reduces the joist's factored capacity and may allow deflection to develop under sustained load.
Recommendation
Have the joist evaluated and reinforced by a qualified contractor. Sistering a full-length member alongside the notched joist is the customary remedy.
Referral: General contractor or structural engineer
P-10P-11Curated source: FR-1.22 · Protocol item: floor_framing_inspectionF-07 · Attic, above main bedroom
Minor rafter deflection, no active movement
MinorObservation
Slight deflection was observed in two rafters above the main bedroom, estimated at under 1/2 inch across the span. Collar ties are present and fastened. No cracking, splitting, or bearing displacement was observed. Sheathing above the affected rafters was sound with no delamination.
Why it matters
Deflection of this magnitude in a roof structure of this age is typically long-standing and non-progressive. It is recorded here as a baseline observation rather than a defect requiring correction.
Recommendation
No action required. Re-observe at the next inspection interval to confirm the condition remains static.
Referral: None
P-12Curated source: FR-1.44 · Protocol item: roof_structure_inspection
Electrical
F-08 · Main service panel, basement
Double-tapped breakers in main service panel
SevereObservation
Two circuit breakers in the main service panel were found with two conductors terminated under a single breaker lug. The breakers in question are not listed for multiple conductor termination. The affected breakers serve the kitchen small-appliance circuit and a basement lighting circuit.
Why it matters
A breaker lug not rated for two conductors cannot reliably maintain clamping force on both. The resulting loose connection generates heat under load, and this configuration is a recognised cause of panel fires. The condition is present on a circuit that regularly carries substantial load.
Recommendation
Have a licensed electrician correct both double-tapped connections before occupancy. Correction typically involves installing additional breakers or an approved pigtail connection. This item should be treated as a pre-occupancy correction rather than deferred maintenance.
Referral: Licensed electrician — before occupancy
P-13P-14Curated source: EL-6.01 · Protocol item: service_panel_inspectionF-09 · Kitchen and both bathrooms
Absent GFCI protection at wet-location receptacles
ModerateObservation
Receptacles serving the kitchen counter (three locations), the main bathroom vanity, and the basement bathroom vanity tested without ground-fault circuit interrupter protection. Testing was performed with a plug-in GFCI tester at each location.
Why it matters
GFCI protection interrupts current on detection of a ground fault, and its absence at wet locations removes the primary protection against electrocution in the areas where that risk is highest. This is a life-safety provision rather than a code-compliance formality.
Recommendation
Have a licensed electrician install GFCI protection at all kitchen counter and bathroom receptacles. Protection may be provided at the receptacle or at the breaker.
Referral: Licensed electrician
P-15P-16Curated source: EL-6.18 · Protocol item: gfci_protection_inspectionF-10 · Rear exterior wall
Missing weatherproof cover at exterior receptacle
MinorObservation
The exterior receptacle on the rear wall adjacent to the patio door is missing its weatherproof in-use cover. The receptacle itself is GFCI-protected and tested correctly. Minor corrosion was visible on the mounting strap.
Why it matters
An uncovered exterior receptacle admits moisture to the device and box, which promotes corrosion and can eventually defeat the GFCI device it depends on for protection.
Recommendation
Install a listed weatherproof in-use cover. This is a low-cost owner-serviceable item.
Referral: Owner maintenance
P-17Curated source: EL-6.33 · Protocol item: exterior_receptacle_inspection
Plumbing
F-11 · Water heater, basement utility room
TPR discharge pipe terminates above required height
MinorObservation
The temperature-pressure relief valve discharge pipe terminates approximately 8 inches above the floor. The customary maximum termination height is 6 inches. The pipe is correctly sized, is of approved material, and runs downward without traps.
Why it matters
A discharge pipe terminating too high above the floor increases the risk of scalding spray reaching a person standing nearby during a relief event. The remainder of the installation is correct.
Recommendation
Extend the discharge pipe to terminate between 2 and 6 inches above the floor.
Referral: Plumber or owner maintenance
P-18Curated source: PL-3.14 · Protocol item: water_heater_inspectionF-12 · Basement, main supply entry
Corrosion at main supply shutoff valve
MinorObservation
Green corrosion product was observed at the packing nut of the main water supply shutoff valve. The valve body is dry, and no active drip was observed during a 20-minute observation period. The valve was not operated during the inspection.
Why it matters
Corrosion at the packing nut indicates a past or intermittent weep. Gate valves of this age commonly fail to seat fully when operated after long periods of inactivity, which can leave a property without a functioning main shutoff during an emergency.
Recommendation
Have a plumber evaluate and, if appropriate, replace the valve with a quarter-turn ball valve. Confirm the valve fully closes as part of the same visit.
Referral: Plumber
P-19Curated source: PL-3.02 · Protocol item: supply_piping_inspectionF-13 · Kitchen sink cabinet
S-trap configuration at kitchen sink drain
ModerateObservation
The kitchen sink drain is configured as an S-trap, with the trap arm turning vertically downward without an intervening vent connection. No vent was visible within the cabinet.
Why it matters
An S-trap is prone to siphoning its own water seal as waste discharges, which allows sewer gas to enter the living space. The condition is intermittent by nature and may not be apparent to occupants until the seal is lost.
Recommendation
Have a plumber reconfigure the drain to a P-trap with proper venting, or install a listed air admittance valve where local practice permits.
Referral: Plumber
P-20Curated source: PL-3.27 · Protocol item: drain_waste_vent_inspection
HVAC
F-14 · Furnace, basement utility room
Furnace near end of service life; filter restricted
ModerateObservation
The furnace filter was visibly clogged with dust and lint, substantially restricting airflow. The unit's manufacturer data plate indicates a manufacture date of 2010, giving an approximate age of 16 years. The heat exchanger was not accessible for direct visual inspection. The unit responded to thermostat call and produced heat during the inspection.
Why it matters
A restricted filter reduces airflow across the heat exchanger, which raises operating temperatures and shortens equipment life. At 16 years the unit is at or near the end of typical service life for forced-air furnaces, and the heat exchanger condition cannot be confirmed without disassembly.
Recommendation
Replace the filter immediately and establish a quarterly replacement schedule. Have the unit serviced by an HVAC contractor including a heat exchanger evaluation. Begin budget planning for replacement.
Referral: HVAC contractor
P-21P-22Curated source: HV-5.02 · Protocol item: furnace_inspectionF-15 · Furnace flue, basement
Separated joint in furnace flue vent connector
SevereObservation
The single-wall metal vent connector between the furnace and the chimney thimble is separated at the second joint from the appliance. A visible gap of approximately 10 mm is present around the full circumference. No fasteners were present at the joint. Light soot deposits were observed on the surface below the separation.
Why it matters
A separated flue vent connector permits combustion products, including carbon monoxide, to spill into the occupied basement rather than venting to the exterior. Soot deposits indicate that spillage has already occurred. This is an immediate life-safety condition.
Recommendation
Do not operate the furnace until the vent connector has been repaired. Have an HVAC contractor reassemble and fasten the connector, and verify draft under operating conditions. Install carbon monoxide alarms on each level if not already present.
Referral: HVAC contractor — immediate; do not operate until corrected
P-23P-24Curated source: HV-5.19 · Protocol item: combustion_venting_inspectionF-16 · Crawlspace, west run
Disconnected supply duct in crawlspace
ModerateObservation
A flexible supply duct serving the west bedroom is disconnected at the plenum takeoff and is discharging conditioned air into the crawlspace. The duct is otherwise intact and insulated.
Why it matters
Conditioned air discharged into a crawlspace is entirely lost, raising energy cost and leaving the served room under-conditioned. Positive pressure in the crawlspace also drives moisture-laden air into the floor assembly.
Recommendation
Have the duct reconnected and secured at the takeoff with a mechanical fastener and mastic. Inspect remaining crawlspace duct connections during the same visit.
Referral: HVAC contractor
P-25Curated source: HV-5.31 · Protocol item: duct_distribution_inspection
Insulation & Ventilation
F-17 · Attic, general
Attic insulation below current recommended depth
MinorObservation
Blown cellulose insulation in the attic measures between 5 and 7 inches in depth across sampled locations, corresponding to approximately R-20. Coverage is uneven, with thin areas at the perimeter above the top plates. Baffles are present at the eaves and are unobstructed.
Why it matters
Insulation depth below current recommendations increases heating and cooling cost and contributes to uneven interior temperatures. It is an efficiency consideration rather than a safety or structural one.
Recommendation
Consider supplementing to approximately R-49 for this climate zone. Prioritise the perimeter areas where depth is lowest. Confirm baffles remain unobstructed after any addition.
Referral: Insulation contractor — discretionary
P-26Curated source: IN-8.04 · Protocol item: attic_insulation_inspectionF-18 · Attic, above main bathroom
Bathroom exhaust fan terminates within attic space
ModerateObservation
The main bathroom exhaust fan duct terminates inside the attic space rather than at an exterior termination. Moisture staining and light mould growth were observed on the sheathing within approximately three feet of the duct outlet.
Why it matters
Discharging humid air into an unconditioned attic condenses moisture on cold sheathing, producing the staining and growth observed. Continued operation will progressively damage the sheathing and may affect insulation performance.
Recommendation
Extend the duct to a dedicated roof or gable exterior termination with a backdraft damper. Have the affected sheathing evaluated and treated. Confirm the fan achieves adequate flow after modification.
Referral: HVAC or general contractor
P-27P-28Curated source: IN-8.22 · Protocol item: exhaust_ventilation_inspection
Evidence index
Every photograph, timestamped and hashed
Hashes are truncated for display; full values are retained in the platform record and can be verified against the original file.
| Ref | Captured | Subject | Finding |
|---|---|---|---|
| P-01 | 09:14:22 | Roof, south plane | F-01 |
| P-02 | 09:15:07 | Roof, south plane detail | F-01 |
| P-03 | 09:16:44 | Gutter trough, granule accumulation | F-01 |
| P-04 | 09:22:10 | Downspout, northeast corner | F-02 |
| P-05 | 09:31:55 | Chimney base flashing, north face | F-03 |
| P-06 | 09:32:31 | Chimney flashing, northeast gap | F-03 |
| P-07 | 09:41:18 | South elevation cladding damage | F-04 |
| P-08 | 10:03:47 | Basement northwest foundation wall | F-05 |
| P-09 | 10:04:26 | Crack width measurement | F-05 |
| P-10 | 10:19:02 | Crawlspace joist notch | F-06 |
| P-11 | 10:19:48 | Notch depth measurement | F-06 |
| P-12 | 10:38:15 | Attic rafters above main bedroom | F-07 |
| P-13 | 10:52:39 | Main service panel, cover removed | F-08 |
| P-14 | 10:53:12 | Double-tapped breaker detail | F-08 |
| P-15 | 11:07:24 | Kitchen counter receptacle test | F-09 |
| P-16 | 11:11:03 | Main bath vanity receptacle test | F-09 |
| P-17 | 11:19:50 | Rear exterior receptacle | F-10 |
| P-18 | 11:33:41 | Water heater TPR discharge | F-11 |
| P-19 | 11:36:19 | Main supply shutoff valve | F-12 |
| P-20 | 11:48:56 | Kitchen sink drain configuration | F-13 |
| P-21 | 12:02:11 | Furnace data plate | F-14 |
| P-22 | 12:03:04 | Furnace filter condition | F-14 |
| P-23 | 12:07:38 | Flue vent connector separation | F-15 |
| P-24 | 12:08:22 | Soot deposits below connector | F-15 |
| P-25 | 12:21:47 | Crawlspace disconnected supply duct | F-16 |
| P-26 | 12:35:09 | Attic insulation depth measurement | F-17 |
| P-27 | 12:39:52 | Bath exhaust duct termination | F-18 |
| P-28 | 12:40:31 | Sheathing staining near outlet | F-18 |
Source references
Each finding cites a curated source reference from the pinned protocol pack, fixed for the life of this report so the basis of every finding remains reproducible after the pack is revised.
- RC-4.12
- Roof covering approaching end of serviceable life
- GT-2.03
- Downspout discharges at grade adjacent to foundation
- FL-4.21
- Deteriorated sealant at chimney base flashing
- EX-7.09
- Impact damage to vinyl cladding
- FD-1.08
- Vertical hairline crack in poured foundation wall
- FR-1.22
- Floor joist notched beyond allowable depth
- FR-1.44
- Minor rafter deflection, no active movement
- EL-6.01
- Double-tapped breakers in main service panel
- EL-6.18
- Absent GFCI protection at wet-location receptacles
- EL-6.33
- Missing weatherproof cover at exterior receptacle
- PL-3.14
- TPR discharge pipe terminates above required height
- PL-3.02
- Corrosion at main supply shutoff valve
- PL-3.27
- S-trap configuration at kitchen sink drain
- HV-5.02
- Furnace near end of service life; filter restricted
- HV-5.19
- Separated joint in furnace flue vent connector
- HV-5.31
- Disconnected supply duct in crawlspace
- IN-8.04
- Attic insulation below current recommended depth
- IN-8.22
- Bathroom exhaust fan terminates within attic space
Review and audit trail
What the inspector changed, and when
Findings not listed below were accepted as drafted with no edits.
| Finding | Review action | Edits | Approved |
|---|---|---|---|
| F-01 | Accepted as drafted | 0 | 14:02 |
| F-02 | Accepted as drafted | 0 | 14:02 |
| F-03 | Edited — recommendation expanded | 1 | 14:03 |
| F-05 | Edited — measurement corrected | 2 | 14:05 |
| F-06 | Edited — referral added | 1 | 14:06 |
| F-08 | Edited — severity confirmed, wording tightened | 1 | 14:09 |
| F-09 | Accepted as drafted | 0 | 14:10 |
| F-13 | Edited — remedy options added | 1 | 14:13 |
| F-15 | Edited — do-not-operate instruction added | 2 | 14:17 |
| F-18 | Accepted as drafted | 0 | 14:19 |
- Findings drafted
- 18
- Findings edited
- 7
- Evidence items linked
- 28
- Review duration
- 38 minutes
Inspector approval
Every finding above was reviewed, edited where necessary, and explicitly approved by the inspector of record before this report was made available for delivery. The inspector of record is accountable for the content of this report.
M. Alvarez
Licensed Home Inspector · HI-48213
